Another 20 Years of Story with 20T of Direction
Rebooting of Indian Economy - The Retail to Core Effect
What led to revising risk profile ?
How Banks, NBFC & EPFO will change scenario ?
Concerns and Solutions ( Need to maintain Continuity and Momentum)
Major concerns raised by the RBI regarding the Indian economy
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has highlighted several key concerns in its recent reports, including the Monetary Policy Report and the Financial Stability Report.
While the economic outlook remains resilient, these areas require continuous monitoring:
- Widening credit-deposit growth gap: Credit growth is consistently outpacing deposit mobilization. This trend leads to higher-cost funding for banks and increases the credit-deposit ratio, a metric the RBI watches closely for potential systemic risks.
- Rapid growth in unsecured lending: The RBI has flagged the aggressive growth in certain consumer credit segments, including credit cards and other unsecured personal loans, raising concerns over potential overleverage and higher default risks. Stricter risk-weight norms were imposed in late 2023 and early 2024 to curb this trend.
- Elevated deep-stage stress in fintech lending: While the growth in fintech lending has slowed following RBI interventions, the delinquency rates for severely overdue loans (over 180 days past due) remain elevated. This indicates potential risks, particularly for smaller-ticket loans.
- Irregularities in gold loans: The RBI has noted irregularities in loans against gold ornaments and jewelry, emphasizing the need for stricter monitoring and oversight by lenders.
- Financial stability risks from private credit: The rise of the private credit market and its interconnectedness with banks and NBFCs creates potential systemic risks. The RBI is emphasizing the need to monitor these links to prevent regulatory loopholes.
- Household financial assets shift: Data indicates that household financial assets as a percentage of GDP remain subdued, reflecting a shift away from traditional bank deposits toward capital market investments. This trend affects banks' funding base and is a long-term concern.
- Volatility in external sector: While India's external sector remains stable, global uncertainties, geopolitical tensions, and trade policy fluctuations continue to pose risks that can impact the Indian rupee and overall economic stability.
- Interest Cost: The cost of finance, measured by interest expenses as a percentage of borrowings, rose to 9.2% as of September 2024, but remains manageable.
- Stagnant sales growth: of 6.2% year-on-year during H1 of 2024-25, consistent with H2 of 2023-24. Manufacturing companies recorded sales growth of 4.9%, while IT and non-IT services sectors saw higher growth rates of 5.7% and 9.6%, respectively.
- Rising input and staff costs: Moderated operating profit growth to 4.3% for manufacturing firms, leading to a slight decline in operating profit margins across sectors
- RBI in 2024 tapered the Credit growth to meet the challenge of reduced Deposit growth. This led to reduced credit growth in 2025 H1 which in turn led to reduced GDP growth.
- Credit: Credit growth of 13% YoY in H1 FY25 , YoY Growth - Retail: 15%, Agri: 15%, MSME: 16%, Corporate: 9% CD ratio at 78%, indicating potential stress in funding availability going forward • Deposits: Grew 12% , YoY in H1 FY25 Industry CASA Ratio: 37% YoY Growth – CASA: 7%, TD: 15%
Parameter |
H1 2023 (Apr–Sept 2023) |
H2 2023 (Oct 2023–Mar 2024) |
H1 2024 (Apr–Sept 2024) |
H2 2024 (Oct 2024–Mar 2025) |
H1 2025 (Apr–Sept 2025) |
GDP Growth (Real) |
8.2% (Q1), 8.1% (Q2) |
6.2% (Q3), 7.8% (Q4) |
6.7% (Q1), 5.4% (Q2) |
6.2% (Q3), 6.5% (Q4)
- estimates |
7.8% (Q1) - estimated |
CPI Inflation |
Peaked above
7% |
Eased below 4.6% |
Averaged 4.6% |
Continued moderation |
Easing further, down
to 1.55% by July 2025 |
Core Inflation |
Sticky, elevated |
Eased |
Remained subdued |
Eased to 3.5% by
March 2025 |
Remained low |
Deposit Growth
(Y-o-Y) |
Around 11.2% |
Slowed to 10.2% |
Around 10.1% |
Tapering, 9.5% by
Sep. 2025 (Y-o-Y) |
9.5% (fortnight ending Sep 19, 2025) |
Credit Growth
(Y-o-Y) |
16.2% |
Moderated to 15.7% |
Moderated to 9.8% |
Continued to outpace
deposit growth |
10.4% (fortnight ending Sep 19, 2025) |
Credit-Deposit Ratio |
78.8% (Dec 2023) |
Above 80% |
78.88% (CY 2024) |
Remained high,
around 80% |
Stabilized
around 79% by May 2025 |
LCR (System Average) |
Above 100% |
Remained strong,
slightly down |
Averaged 118.6% (FY25) |
Maintained strong
buffers, above 100% minimum |
Adequate liquidity
buffers maintained |
PCR (System Average) |
Healthy PCR
maintained |
Healthy PCR
maintained |
Maintained strong
PCR |
Strong PCR
maintained |
Strong PCR
maintained |
Agri Lending (Y-o-Y) |
Strong growth |
Institutional credit
rose to ₹25.48 lakh crore (FY 2023-24) |
Credit disbursement
rose |
Growth continued;
revised PSL targets |
Projected growth
>₹31.5 lakh crore |
PSL Lending |
Robust growth |
Targets met |
Disbursal surged
to ₹42.7 lakh cr by 2024 |
Revised targets
(UCBs at 60%); differentiated weights applied |
Revised targets
applied; focus on underserved areas |
Unsecured Lending
(Y-o-Y) |
Aggressive growth |
Curbs implemented
(Nov 2023) slowed growth |
Growth moderated;
credit card outstanding rose 23%, personal loans 17.1% |
Slower growth |
Slowed further;
fintech deep-stage stress elevated (8.6% DPD > 180 days) |
Retail Credit
(Y-o-Y) |
Strong growth,
driven by personal loans |
Moderated, but
robust growth |
Slowed to 11.8% (Jan
2024); 16.9% (Aug 2024) |
Growth slowed
further |
Moderated to 11.8% (Aug
2025); credit card growth 4.4% |
Solutions and Actions taken without Delay :
Key
RBI changes (September 2024–April 2025) |
|||
Change |
Status |
Why was it required? |
Eventual impact (approximate
value) |
1. Change in monetary policy stance to 'Neutral' |
Effective October
2024. |
To
provide flexibility for future rate adjustments in response to easing
inflation and resilient domestic economic growth. |
Boosted market sentiment and
potentially lowered future borrowing costs. The exact monetary impact depends
on the timing and size of eventual rate cuts. |
2. Repo rate cut and updated economic projections |
Effective April
2025. |
To
support economic growth as inflation trended downward. |
A 25 basis point cut reduced the
repo rate to 6.00%, lowering borrowing costs for banks and encouraging
lending and investment. |
3. Prohibiting prepayment penalties on floating-rate loans |
Effective January
1, 2026, based on a July 2025 directive. |
To
enhance consumer protection and allow borrowers, including Micro and Small
Enterprises (MSEs), more financial flexibility. |
Allows borrowers to switch to
lower-rate loans without penalty, potentially saving individual borrowers and
MSEs thousands of crores. |
4. Enhancements to UPI limits |
Effective October
2024. |
To
encourage broader adoption of UPI for offline and low-value transactions. |
Increased per-transaction limits
for UPI123Pay (to ₹10,000) and UPI Lite (to ₹5,000), supporting higher
volumes of digital payments. |
5. Faster credit information reporting |
Proposed in
October 2024; implementation in 2025. |
Timely
credit data is vital for risk management and lending decisions. |
Changed reporting frequency from
monthly to fortnightly, leading to better risk assessment and potentially
reducing future Non-Performing Assets (NPAs). |
6. Revised framework for Default Loss Guarantee (DLG) in
digital lending |
Clarified in
April 2024 based on earlier guidelines. |
To
manage risk and add clarity to the growing digital lending space. |
Provided a proportional framework
for DLG coverage, creating a more stable and predictable digital lending
ecosystem. |
7. Introduction of beneficiary account name look-up for
RTGS/NEFT |
Proposed October
2024; implementation in 2025. |
To
mitigate the risk of misdirected funds and fraud in high-value electronic
transfers. |
Facilitates name verification,
reducing wrong credits and boosting customer confidence. |
8. Revised PSL Targets for Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs) |
Effective April
1, 2025. |
To
ensure adequate credit flow to priority sectors and align with evolving
financial market conditions. |
The overall PSL target was revised
to 60% of ANBC or Credit Equivalent of Off-Balance Sheet Exposure (CEOBE),
whichever is higher. This measure ensures a significant portion of UCB
lending is directed toward priority sectors. |
9. Differentiated PSL weights for Scheduled Commercial
Banks |
Effective for
FY 2024-25. |
To
address regional credit disparities and incentivize banks to lend in
underserved districts. |
A higher weight (125%) was
assigned to incremental PSL credit in districts with lower per capita credit
flow, while a lower weight (90%) was applied in districts with higher credit
flow. This mechanism re-allocates credit toward needy regions. |
10. Enhanced loan limits for specific PSL categories |
Effective April
1, 2025. |
To
increase credit access for specific sectors like housing and education. |
Education loans were raised to ₹25 lakh (from ₹20 lakh), and housing
loan limits were increased, varying by population size. This
provides significant capital infusion into these sectors. |
11. Expanded definition of 'Weaker Sections' in PSL |
Effective April
1, 2025. |
To
promote financial inclusion and expand access to credit for underprivileged
groups. |
The list of eligible borrowers was
expanded to include transgender individuals, and the cap on loans to
individual women beneficiaries was removed for UCBs. This change increases
credit availability for a broader base of vulnerable borrowers. |
12. Expanded scope of Renewable Energy under PSL |
Effective April
1, 2025. |
To
support India's transition to clean energy. |
Increased loan limits for large
renewable energy projects (to ₹35 crore) and clarified eligibility for
individual household loans (₹10 lakh). This promotes green investments. |
Recent RBI changes affecting NBFCs (2024–2025)
The table below summarizes recent and proposed
changes by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) affecting Non-Banking Financial
Companies (NBFCs). These changes are part of a broader move towards the
Scale-Based Regulatory (SBR) Framework, which was initiated in late 2021 to
align regulation with the systemic risk posed by different NBFCs.
Change/Norm |
Details (2024–2025 Updates) |
Impact |
Scale-Based
Regulation (SBR) |
Implementation: Full implementation continues, with
NBFCs categorized into four layers based on size, activity, and risk: Base,
Middle, Upper, and Top. |
Regulatory intensity
is now proportional to systemic risk. Larger NBFCs in the upper layers face
stricter prudential norms and capital requirements, while smaller ones have
lighter oversight. |
Capital Adequacy
(CRAR) |
Unsecured Lending: In November 2023, risk weights on
personal loans were increased from 100% to 125% for NBFCs. Risk weights on
credit card receivables were increased from 100% to 125%. |
Higher capital is
now required for unsecured loans, strengthening loss absorption buffers. The
reduced risk weights on microfinance and infrastructure lending are expected
to boost credit flow to these sectors. |
Microfinance Lending |
Qualifying Asset
Limit: Reduced from
75% to 60% of total assets (excluding intangibles) in June 2025. Failure to
maintain this limit for four consecutive quarters requires a remediation
plan. |
This provides
NBFC-MFIs with greater operational flexibility to diversify their portfolio
beyond microfinance while ensuring a minimum focus on the core sector. The
NOF update provides relief for smaller MFIs struggling to raise capital. |
Unsecured Lending |
Risk Weights: Risk weights increased on consumer
credit and credit card receivables (details in CRAR row). |
The measures curb
aggressive growth in unsecured lending, mitigating systemic risk and
potential overleveraging. The LTI cap enhances financial discipline and
protects borrowers. |
Secured Lending |
Gold Loans: The RBI highlighted irregularities in
gold loans in September 2024, emphasizing stricter monitoring and oversight. |
Increased scrutiny
of gold loans aims to prevent misuse and protect customer interests. Revised
risk weights on infrastructure lending (mentioned under CRAR) favor secured
infrastructure financing. |
Co-Lending & PSL |
Co-Lending Norms
(Proposed): Revised norms
from January 1, 2026, allow originating entities to retain a minimum 10%
share (down from 20%) and provide a Direct Lending Guarantee (DLG) of up to
5% across all lending types. |
The new co-lending
norms are expected to enhance risk-sharing and reduce funding constraints,
particularly for smaller NBFCs. |
Prudential Norms |
Asset
Classification: NPAs are now
recognized at 90 days overdue for Middle and Upper Layer NBFCs, aligning with
banks. Base Layer NBFCs have a glide path to reach the 90-day norm by March
2026. |
Standardizes asset
quality recognition across the sector, aligning with bank norms and improving
risk management. Provides regulatory certainty for digital lending and
strengthens overall corporate governance. |
Summary of key changes by layer
Parameter |
Base Layer (NBFC-BL) |
Middle Layer (NBFC-ML) |
Upper Layer (NBFC-UL) |
Asset Size |
< ₹1,000 crore |
> ₹1,000 crore
(or deposit-taking) |
Identified as
systemically significant by RBI |
CRAR |
Standard norms |
Standard norms |
Higher capital
requirements |
NPA Recognition |
Phased transition to
90 days by March 2026 |
90 days overdue |
90 days overdue |
Governance |
Basic |
Risk management
committee, chief compliance officer |
Enhanced governance,
risk management, and disclosures |
Listing |
Not mandatory |
Not mandatory |
Mandatory listing
within three years |
Risk Weights |
Standard norms, but
impacted by unsecured lending changes |
Standard norms, but
impacted by unsecured lending changes |
Higher risk weights
(incl. banks lending to NBFC-ULs) |
Summary of EPFO investment recommendations and information
Category |
Details |
RBI Actions and Suggestions |
|
Separate fund management |
Recommended separating the
regulatory functions from fund management to avoid conflicts of interest. |
Remove corporate bond floor |
Suggested removing the minimum
limit for corporate bond investments due to a mismatch between debt issuance
and EPFO inflows. |
Increase technical expertise |
Emphasized the need for more
specialized knowledge in accounting, portfolio management, and actuarial
assessments within EPFO's investment committees. |
Implement modern portfolio
management |
Suggested a more data-driven,
strategic approach rather than a fixed equity investment method. |
Redesign investment benchmarks |
Advised matching benchmarks to the
distinct asset-liability profiles of each fund managed by the EPFO. |
Government Actions |
|
Formed expert panel |
Established a high-level committee
including RBI, Finance Ministry, and Labour Ministry officials to review
investment rules and governance. |
Review existing rules |
The committee will review asset
allocation, accounting, and compliance. |
Consider increasing equity
exposure |
The expert panel is also tasked
with exploring a phased increase in equity investments. |
EPFO Investment Status |
|
Present norms of investment |
Fresh accretions are invested with
the following allocation: 45–65% in government securities, 20–45% in
corporate debt, 5–15% in equities (via ETFs), and up to 5% in short-term debt
instruments. |
Average age of PF employees |
As of recent payroll data, the
18–25 age group dominates new member additions, constituting over 57% of new
subscribers. |
Portfolio value |
The EPFO manages retirement
savings exceeding ₹25 trillion. The total corpus as of March 31, 2022, was
₹18.30 lakh crore. |
Return of PF portfolio |
The interest rate for FY 2024–25
was 8.25%. This was higher than the average yield of 10-year government
securities, which was 6.86% in FY25. |
No comments:
Post a Comment